08-01-2004, 11:40 AM
WRT the female cancer question - I think you'll find the original report from the Cancer Research UK did not lay the blame on circumcised/uncircumcised, but rather having many sexual partners (uncircumcised having the higher level) - the results for a single partner showed little difference in cancer levels, regardless of the state of the todger in question.
I don't see, however, how the question of adult illness/enjoyment affects the original question regarding the procedure performed on infants. Many black tribes only perform the operation at the age of 13 - thus allowing the best of both worlds - the protection it provides and needs in infancy, and the "healthly" sex as an adult. (if only they could perform the operation in a more clinical sterile manner....)
But we seemd to have descended into a "I have no problem with mine although I have only a subjective opinion, with no comparison upon which to base it" and the incorrect usage of statistics, or indeed mere made up stats to "support" our observations of our various performances in bed - when this completely ignores the issue in debate. We do NOT care about your evaluation of your todgers as adults - stick to the childhood question.
Yet we couch our insults with maybe's and possibly's and almosts, when they are specifically targetted to insult each other. Is it so difficult to debate correctly without resorting to a spanish inquisition mentality when someone disagrees with us?
This is a new site, lets play nicely. I you cannot control your temper when someone disagess with you, or if someone else manufactures "stats" to support their dubious answers, then avoid debates - and stick to the banter. Don't get personal or insulting - it is chlidish and unecessary.
And I point this at both sides of this debate, not at any individuals or factions. So any offence I may have caused, I apologise for in advance.
I don't see, however, how the question of adult illness/enjoyment affects the original question regarding the procedure performed on infants. Many black tribes only perform the operation at the age of 13 - thus allowing the best of both worlds - the protection it provides and needs in infancy, and the "healthly" sex as an adult. (if only they could perform the operation in a more clinical sterile manner....)
But we seemd to have descended into a "I have no problem with mine although I have only a subjective opinion, with no comparison upon which to base it" and the incorrect usage of statistics, or indeed mere made up stats to "support" our observations of our various performances in bed - when this completely ignores the issue in debate. We do NOT care about your evaluation of your todgers as adults - stick to the childhood question.
Yet we couch our insults with maybe's and possibly's and almosts, when they are specifically targetted to insult each other. Is it so difficult to debate correctly without resorting to a spanish inquisition mentality when someone disagrees with us?
This is a new site, lets play nicely. I you cannot control your temper when someone disagess with you, or if someone else manufactures "stats" to support their dubious answers, then avoid debates - and stick to the banter. Don't get personal or insulting - it is chlidish and unecessary.
And I point this at both sides of this debate, not at any individuals or factions. So any offence I may have caused, I apologise for in advance.